New Mexico Light Pollution



Outdoor Lighting Control Act

Other Southwestern City
Lighting Ordinances:

Cloudcroft, NM
Tucson, AZ
Flagstaff, AZ

Proposed 1997
New Mexico Outdoor
Lighting Control Act

Las Cruces Sun-News
May 4, 1998 article
on Light Pollution

Guest editorial by
John Gilkison
Las Cruces Sun-News
Sept. 23, 1998


Proposed Outdoor Lighting Control Ordinance,
Las Cruces, New Mexico

Outdoor Lighting Control Ordinance Number xx-xx-xx
for the City of Las Cruces, New Mexico

1.0 Purpose:

The purpose of this ordinance is to regulate the installation and use of outdoor night lighting fixtures in the City of Las Cruces. Some outdoor lighting is essential for public safety, however, careless use of outdoor night lighting generates unnecessary contention between citizens, prevents full enjoyment of property and destroys the beautiful night skies of New Mexico. Glaring outdoor lights are a hazard to traffic and interfere with area safety. Glare does not enhance area security, it only interferes with neighborhood safety by blinding resident and/or security patrol views of homes and businesses, thereby enabling intruders to operate unobserved.

2.0 Applicability:

2.1 The provisions of this ordinance shall apply to all outdoor lighting within the City of Las Cruces regardless of its use or purpose.

2.2 Existing outdoor lighting fixtures that are non-conforming but were legally installed prior to the effective date of this ordinance are excluded for the duration of their useful lives. However, the owners and operators of such currently installed lighting are encouraged to shield and/or adjust their lighting to eliminate glare and prevent light trespass.

2.3 Outdoor lighting installations shall comply with all applicable safety and electrical codes of the City , State and Federal Governments.

2.4 All city facilities shall comply with this ordinance.

2.5 All other governmental agencies, federal, state or county - including their security facilities, which operate within the city limits of Las Cruces should experience no difficulty meeting the requirements of this ordinance and are encouraged to comply with its provisions.

3.0 Exemptions:

3.1 Incandescent fixtures with a total of 100 watts or less per fixture.

3.2 Fossil fuel light sources.

3.3 Emergency lighting utilized during natural or man made disasters but only for the duration of the emergency.

3.4 Temporary lights for special events are excluded, provided the period of the event does not exceed 3 consecutive nights, a special use permit for the event has been obtained and they are extinguished by 11:00 P.M.

3.5 Low pressure glass tubes filled with neon, argon or krypton gas.

3.6 Outdoor advertising signs constructed of translucent material provided they are wholly illuminated from within.

4.0 Compliance:

4.1 General provisions:

4.1.1 Compliance shall require a combination of shielded lighting fixtures, appropriate fixture placement and fixture aiming such that illumination falls only upon areas where lighting is required. Light trespass beyond property boundaries or above the horizontal plane shall be considered non-compliant.

4.1.2 Outdoor lighting which is aimed downward, along the edge or towards the interior of property will normally be compliant provided that light trespass does not occur. Fixture positioning and/or shields must limit the light rays to at least fifteen degrees below the horizontal plane and contain all direct illumination within the boundaries of the owner's property.

4.2 Light Sources:

4.2.1 This ordinance does not prescribe any specific light source provided the principles of fixture shielding and light containment are complied with.

4.2.2 No new unshielded outdoor lighting fixtures shall be installed six months after the date of this ordinance. No replacement equipment, other than bulbs, for non-conforming fixtures shall be sold in the City after January 1, 1999.

4.2.3 Building mounted, wall mounted and freestanding exterior lighting shall be directed down and shielded away from adjacent properties and streets.

4.3 Lights used to Advertise or Attract Attention:

4.3.1 Glare from business lighting is occasionally used to attract attention or for advertisement purposes. Such intentional or inadvertent light uses are prohibited.

4.3.2 Advertising signs, bill boards or building surfaces used for advertisement must be illuminated in accordance with City Ordinance xx-xx-xx which controls signage. All light aimed at a sign shall be captured by the sign. Glare or light emission beyond the sign edges or towards the sky is not permitted.

4.3.3 Lasers or searchlights aimed above the horizon or at the sky for personal celebrations, sales events, product introductions or to highlight public events are prohibited.

4.4 Sports Facilities, Parking Lots and other Large Outdoor Facilities:

4.4.1 Existing sports facilities and other large outdoor facilities shall acquire and install shields designed to eliminate glare and light spillage beyond their borders. All light fixtures shall be adjusted and shielded such that all light rays are projected at least fifteen degrees below the horizonal plane.

4.4.2 Lighting shall be limited to those periods when field or area lighting is actually required. No outdoor recreational facility, whether public or private, shall be illuminated between the hours of 11 P.M. and sunrise. The only exception would be to conclude an event that was in progress prior to 11 P.M. and requires a minimum of time to complete.

4.4.3 All new installations, modernization, or replacement fixtures shall employ properly shielded field lighting fixtures.

5.0 Violations and Penalties:

5.1 The provisions of this Outdoor Lighting Control Ordinance are cumulative and supplemental. If any County, State or Federal law, act, ordinance or resolution is adopted with provisions restricting light trespass that are more stringent than those outlined in this ordinance, the more stringent provisions shall apply.

5.2 Any individual, firm or corporation violating the provisions of the Outdoor Lighting Control Ordinance will be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor and shall be sentenced pursuant to the provisions of Section 31-19-1 NMSA 1978.

5.3 The violator shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during which a violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance is committed, permitted or allowed to continue.

6.0 Definitions:

6.1 "Light Pollution" is any artificial emission of light which causes a detrimental effect on the environment, glare or undesirable illumination of adjacent properties.

6.2 "Shielded" shall mean a fixture that is shielded in such a manner that light rays emitted by the fixture, either directly from the lamp or indirectly from the fixture, are projected at least fifteen degrees below a horizonal plane running through the lowest point on the fixture where light is emitted.

6.3 "Outdoor Lighting Fixture" shall mean any form of artificial illuminating device, whether permanent or portable, used for illumination or advertisement, to include searchlights, spotlights or floodlights whether for parking lot lighting, landscape lighting, billboards, sports facility, architectural or street lighting.

6.4 "Light Trespass" shall mean any undesired illumination that falls on adjacent property interfering with the rights of the adjacent property owner to peaceful and full enjoyment of their property.

Please press your Reload/Refresh button to insure that you retrieve the most recent comments.

Returned
Comments
& Dialog

 

To add your comments
to this list, please
click here.


John Gilkison (jgilkiso@nmsu.edu) writes:

My comment on the CLC proposed ordinance is as follows:

2.2 Exemption for existing fixtures is the same as the state bill: too open ended and too long. Recommend a definitive cut off date, like 10 years, hopefully less.

3.1 Exemptions should be changed from Incandescent to Residential fixtures with a total of 1,000 lumens or less per fixture not to total over 3,000 lumens. This is the porch light exemptions and it should be lumens capped and not refer to the source but to lumens.

3.6 Outdoor signs constructed of a translucent material provided that they are totally lighted from within should also specify dark backgrounds with lighter colored lettering or signage.

4.2, which talks about building mounted fixtures (i.e., wallpacks), should mention the 15 degrees below the horizontal general requirement again or then the property line whichever is required as long as 15 degrees is the maximum allowable.

4.3.1 Glare to attract attention, the 70,000 lumens cap per acre for businesses could be inserted here. A unshielded lumens cap for businesses may also be here. It could be 3,000 lumens per acre also or less, rather than 1,000 lumens per fixture.

4.3.2 On billboards and sign lighting in general, this language which talks about lighting signs so that all the light is captured by the sign is meaningless. It is meaningless because uplighting even if fully captured makes it directly then back into the sky which contributes to skyglow. It needs to be stated in this provision that all such signs shall be lighted from the top down. Down light signs could only contribute to skyglow by a maximum of 15% times the reflectance of the sign itself.

Finally we need to be on the lookout for provisions and situations not covered in this ordinance. One that comes to mind is a shielded lumens cap on residential to control excessive illumination there. Even fully shielded lighting can be annoying if too bright for a small area.


Dave Schuhmann (jschuhma@nmsu.Edu) writes:

Having read John Gilkison's comments and heard his presentation at Mesilla, I first of all would like to second all his comments, with special emphasis on several things:

1) the absolute requirement that the light not leave the property. The new stamping plant building just east of Love's on I-10 is a good example of atrocious wall pack lighting;

2) the brightness of lighting even if shielded and along with that the limit on grandfathering, which should be no MORE than 5 years, with City and ETZ reps going around to encourage compliance even with current lighting; and

3) the overwhelming importance of his last paragraph which states we must be on the lookout for things not covered. This was something that kept coming to mind while reading the main body of the ordinance. Once the ordinance is passed (assuming that measure of success) it will be extremely difficult to amend. I have seen this so many times in the past; commercial interests will scream and holler enough about what is already there and will never allow addenda without a bloody battle. Witness the sign ordinance, which has become such a toothless tiger that they might as well start over. Also everyone gets variances, which I would hope would not be possible under the lighting ordinance.

I may have further comments after further contemplation.